The IPCC Prepares to Release More Hot Air
The IPCC is preparing to release a “Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 ºC.”
That sentence alone should be enough to make everyone within earshot duck for cover from the coming barrage of climate-related doomporn. But, sadly, half of the public will actively cheer the occasion and the other half will have no idea what is even happening. This is as sure a sign as any that the propagandists of the Global Warming Fear Cult (and their corporate/bankster/globalist backers) have succeeded in the most successful brainwashing campaign in the history of humanity.
Allow me to explain . . .
Discover what the globalist carbon eugenicists and their pals in the mainstream mockingbird media don’t want you to know about the upcoming IPCC report in this week’s editorial. For full access to the subscriber newsletter, and to support this website, please become a member.
For free access to this editorial, please CLICK HERE.
This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register here.
Filed in: Newsletter
Subscribe
If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to receive more just like it.
Global warming (aka climate change) must be real. Here in Edmonton last month we had two snowfalls before the middle of September.
Everyone knows that during the crystallization of water molecules into snowflakes there is a release of energy (heat of formation) as water molecules move into the lower energy bonding state in the more stable snowflake sructure.
This year we could see so much snow that a caldron of heat will envelope us. We’re doomed. Save us, IPCC, save us.
Where’s Johnny Chinook when you need him?
Well, I guess you can put away the shotgun because the mosquitoes are gone.
Gosh, Mr Corbett! Mighty obliging of you to prepare my next Uni class for me like that – Preparing your own highly condensed climate scam Summary Report in such a timely way for diffusion and debate amongst the unsuspecting, impressionable and multinational youth (high percentage of Russians) next Thursday! (unfortunately the rest of their semester has been entirely planned out by those foolish enough to have hired me; but next Thursday I have free reign!)
You shall be presented as a “climate change, global warming, denier, skeptic, realist” and the groups, armed with their ever-present computers (silly cyborgs that they are?), will attempt to prove or disprove your denialist ravings.
Temperature in the classroom guarenteed to go up by at least 1.5 degrees!!
I owe you one! (maybe more than one actually but who’s counting?)
whooopsy daisy! “guaranteed” and not “guarenteed” to go up…
MBP. Did you ever get around to Vermontindependent and Baldwin’s articals on climate change via the US NAVY, AIRFORCE racketeers. Can’t find link right now , time crunch.
Today is Oct. 7th 2018. The Tulsa World ran an article by Seth Brorenstien, Associated Press, Washington, entitled
“Wind Turbines Warm Air Locally” The sited sources are the regular clowns. Ken Caldera, David Keith, and lead author Lee Miller. Quickly said wind turbines cause 2°f rise at night locally but not globally. So ” let the clowns in? There all ready hear. BS BS BS. No mention at all of UNCLE SUGAR! Please pass that along to the initiates. You are a bear.
Vermont Ind. did some good work early.
Manmade climate change/global warming is a hoax that has been skinned, quartered, sliced, diced and thrown onto the world’s scrap heap of grand lies offered up for humanity.
And now they’re proffering another lie. Global warming is causing a global drought.
Pigs fly, too.
Know they’ve been tinkering with the weather since the 1940’s.
Saw them prevent it from raining in the 1950’s? Was in the court room when the judge grounded the planes where it was happening. Here’s what brought the trial on.
Imagine a straight highway west into the mirage with flatland farms on the right and ranchland mountains you couldn’t get a plow in on the left. Now imagine a decade long drought in progress. The farmers have aquifer wells. The ranchers have mountains and brown grass and are desperate for rain. The farmers hire a “weather service†firm to dissipate “potential hail clouds†(read thunderheads/rain clouds). The ranchers asked them to stop. Farmers said no. Seeder pilots began finding an occasional bullet hole in their aircraft. (No planes were downed and no one was hurt.) Pilot enthusiasm for dissipating rain clouds waned. The judge faded the heat and grounded the seeding planes after the lawsuit/trial ended.
Case law about screwing with weather came from this ruling and was ignored, or ‘worked around’, because it didn’t fit The Agenda.
Hard to imagine where they are now with their “weather technologyâ€. Won’t haarp on that though.
After being laughed off their world AGW stage, after their “warming†files were hacked ahead of Copenhagen and their Paris Climate “treaty†went south, and after passing out an Oscar and couple of Nobel’s to eager climateers (Gore, Obama), they found themselves unable to convince any but the faithful that global warming was real. So . . . what to do? Too late and no time to come up with The New Plan. Wait a minute! Why don’t we just create a global drought and be done with it? Toast the land and make a little money off scarce food commodities. Short a few futures and useless eaters along the way.
And so they did. Made that call a couple decades ago and sent the tankers aloft. An AGW two-minute drill. To create global warming. They’ve been spraying the globe’s stratosphere with strontium, barium, aluminum and god know what else since the 1990’s.
And the boys behind the curtain keep lying and saying this isn’t happening.
But it is.
PART 1
[3] William Thomas “Contrails Mystify, Sicken Americans,â€
http://web.archive.org/web/19990429021525/http:/ens.lycos.com/ens/jan99/1999L-01-08-05.html
ENS, Jan 08, 1999.
PART 2
“Mystery Contrails May Be Modifying Weatherâ€
https://rense.com/earthchanges/mystcont.htm
By William Thomas
Source: Lycos Environment News Service
OUR GEOENGINEERING AGE: The Complete Series
https://vermontindependent.net/disinformation-and-the-origins-of-the-geoengineering-resistance-movement-our-geoengineering-age-essay-9/
Researched and written by Ian Baldwin
published by the Vermont Independent
January 14, 1999
From Corbett’s article…
I love how this line is painted: “You will see a lot of breathless coverage about the coming “end of the world†via fiery CO2-induced heat death….”
Highlighting again…
Broc and Corbett chatting video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t2yh1fuVfY&feature=youtu.be&t=409
(Linked from the paragraph where James mentions “How Big Oil Conquered the World”.)
Corbett’s “implemented laws” link within “CARBON EUGENICS” is interesting…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_sterilization
oops, sorry James, you just lost me there. As a physicist-lawyer that has studied this matter both scientifically and politically, I can say with firm reassurance that you’re full of beans on this issue. I just signed up as a member but now I fear I must depart.
oops, sorry jrgjrg, can you, with firm “reassurance”, prove, or at least support, your point of view scientifically (never mind politically) before you run away?
If a physicist-lawyer (presumably well educated and used to using rigorous logic and reason before jumping to conclusions) will run away immediately after subscribing to this site (not long enough for him to go through all the dense evidence presented on this issue), that tells you everything you need to know. Is that someone who would contribute to this site? Probably not with that mindset.
You shall be missed, jrgjrg. I’ll remember fondly all of those fiery discussions we shared. Hopefully we’ll be able to see you again, before the ice melts and all that frozen mammoth meat floods the global markets.
One will note that the convention (signed in 1992) assumed from the very start, before the IPCC had even delivered its first assessment report, that “anthropogenic interference with the climate system†was “dangerous†and that it was the convention’s duty to prevent it by stabilizing greenhouse gases.
This is an extremely crucial point. Essentially, the IPCC is laundering legitimacy for the UNFCCC. Laundering it very poorly and indiscreetly I might add.
My advice is: Beware especially of social scientists, political scientists or the like, like Corbett or Molynieu pontificating grandiloquently like snake oil salesmen about real physical science.
Stick to what you know, James. You’re doing a great job when you’re on your subjects. This is a terrible job.
There’s a reason all those chemtrails are up in the sky and it’s clear that they know climate change is real and they need to do something drastic about it, like Solar Radiation Management (originally proposed by Dr. Edward Teller in 1997), and they have no other solution because the oiligarchs aren’t prepared to cooperate with saving the planet.
And they make no secret about it to their cohorts in their papers, as long as you use the right buzzwords like SRM instead of chemtrails. They’re very open about it.
If Corbett “pontificates grandiloquently like snake oil salesmen”, then why did you subscribe?
Of course climate change is real
but why do they need to spray bio-toxic heavy metals to stop it when man’s survived climate change without such potentially irreversibly dangerous measures to present?
What makes you think the planet needs to be saved when it’s survived 4 billion years of climate change?
Links please.
Why did I subscribe.
Because in an impulsive effervescence of exuberance, I cognitively dissonenced my awareness of Corbett’s folly of cult idealogical climate denial. He doesn’t know what he’s talking about on this topic. Hot air? You bet. Who benefits? I wonder.
He just reminded me in time.
This is as intellectually dishonest as it gets. You can’t politicize science. It completely undermines his estimable credibility.
Dane, is that you? I almost didn’t recognize you, you old dog. How are things in lala land?
No links. No substance. No evidence of what you put forth.
Ad Hominem and Appeal to authority do not function here.
You’re clearly more interested in casting aspersions and creating confusion than describing reality. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.
Anyone who has taken even a cursory glance at the immense body of scientific proof and analysis Mr Corbett has provided over the years on the topic of AGW aka Climate Change will know beyond the shadow of a doubt that
what he is denouncing is precisely the quasi-religious politicization of climate science and the destruction of the scientific method
practiced and proselytized at its powerful mecca:
The InterGovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
(hint: It’s a political body as its name irrefutably indicates).
I seriously doubt that the intent behind chemtrails is to save mankind.
Perhaps, the intent behind chemtrails is CONTROL.
(8 seconds) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVY1-v97Mic
Yes, control of the food supply is the most plausible explanation I’ve heard to date… (if you’re the only one who can grow grains in heavy metal poisoned soil then…)
then there was this provocative notion that they’re destroying the Earth and its inhabitants also to justify sending folks into space…
you know, as portrayed in that blockbuster, Interstellar.
or perhaps to drive us all into so-called “Smart” cities…
now I’ll have to drive myself into the hamsterwheel…
so see you soon in a bubble city on Trantor…
If what was put forth by the person behind the now defunct weatherwar101 website holds any merit (which is probably completely impossible to confirm even if it does seem to pass the smell test) they may be spraying (at least part of what they are spraying) out of necessity or, maybe better said, out of desperation.
For those who are not in the know, that theory claims the atmosphere has, due to a century of pollution with very small particles, lost its inherent ability to seed clouds. According to it, without artificial cloud seeding there virtually wouldn’t be any cloud formations. Which would lend itself spectacularly to the so called “global warming”. Hand in hand with cloud seeding goes mass vapor generation and next generation “HAARP” activity.
While the story is audacious at best if it would turn out to be true the lie uncovered could just be the most brazen, bald faced; most deleterious lie in the modern history. Of course, extraordinary claims necessitate extraordinary evidence which, in my view, were not provided by the author. The story does fit in perfectly, however and it could put the global warming scam into a whole new light, raise it to a doomsday cult status with credibility and then some.
I’m concerned they may be planning to use geoengineering to prove themselves right.
In fact I suspect they may already be using it in California to create droughts (and subsequent firestorms) to scare the trendsetting state into approving any & all legislation related to ‘Climate Change’ (née Global Warming).
In my opinion, they have long been using geo engineering to prove themselves right as in producing evidence after committing the crime. Or to punish others into submission or death as with Hugo Chavez who claimed that the Haiti earthquake was caused by the United States “earthquake machine”. Strange how the timing of natural disasters coincide with ‘global-warming scares.’ I recall when a Preacher wanted funding for the Church’s Sound-System, which always seemed to break-down during his sermons. Later, it was discovered that he was tampering with the settings but he continued to extract from the sheeple.
This article was referred to in a video on SRM (can’t remember the video name/author).
https://globalnews.ca/news/2934513/empty-skies-after-911-set-the-stage-for-an-unlikely-climate-change-experiment/
As I recall, the video narrator posed the question: How would cloud seeding/SRM reduce global warming when it appears that normal contrails (which also seed clouds) seem to have a net warming effect?
Getting deja vu… (was this from a TCR video?)
Well, well.. have a look at the image The Guardian ended up choosing for their new “climate change catastrophe” article.
Not sure why it makes much difference in the final analysis if oceans are rising due to one reason or the other or combination of both. Do we not need to error on the side that stops what ever contribution there is: from what ever source it may be.
How much “erroring” would be sufficient?
Thank you James. Great Article. I wonder why Piers Corbyn gets so little mainstream media attention, perhaps a David fighting Goliath. Check-Out https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jan/24/piers-corbyn-other-rebel-in-the-family-jeremy-corbyn-climate-change. I am not endorsing it because I need to do more research on this subject but I am open-minded. Extract is as follows: “It was in those weeks and months, Corbyn suggests, that Margaret Thatcher came up with her most devious plan to deindustrialise Britain and defeat the miners once and for all: she would popularise and endorse the science of man-made climate change, as a way of converting Britain from coal to nuclear power. The Hadley Centre, the world’s first dedicated research institution became her pet project. Thatcher, who later recanted her doom-mongering, “probably knew climate change was nonsense,†Corbyn suggests, “she was a scientist. But she was also a politician. The rest is history.â€
I had occasion to have lengthy discussions with a geologist who tooted his own horn about being an open-minded “scientist” but he would ‘run away’ from controversial subjects by claiming he was a professional who knew his stuff. I also had lengthy conversations with a psychologist who claimed her background was in Philosophy but, once again, she spewed out book-knowledge and would not engage in critical-thinking or of questioning the status-quo.” Beware of those who hide behind their professional memberships and compartmentalized specialities but have no in-depth and comprehensive knowledge and cannot connect the dots. They are a dangerous breed that can mesmerize and mislead others by quoting ‘one-liners’, particularly common among new grads who depend on speed-reading and scanning; memorization; digital cutting and pasting from other works; presentations; group-assignments etc. with less emphasis on individual research, creative-thinking, individual responsibility. I had some discussions with a University-Grad who said he was a critical-thinker as he had done a one-semester course on this subject. Critical-thinking is an Art, nurtured over time and not a crammed course of theories, terminologies and some class-room discussions. This situation is disheartening and scary as the conversations usually break-down into Relativism and Political Correctness and everyone goes their merry way. What an effective method of ‘divide and rule’, which has now pervaded our schools of thought, institutions, disciplines, professions, others. Joining Interest-Groups may be the answer but run if they evolve into a Group-Think Mentality.
Tx for the link
I watched a video on Bitchute.
They did not make this connection in the video.
They did try to prove that warming was not as advertised.
What I noticed
noticed
was that the historical records did not account for “real feel” temps.
so this year in North Carolina, including today, is that Real Feel temps are generally 7F to 10F greater than thermometers. Which corresponds to the temp increases the last decade has been recording.
Obviously, I’m not gonna take an hour video to type ten thousand words of explanation, nor am I going to link that video, it was days ago.
But I will put forth that the change in temperature is due to the various weather sources stating STATING the real feel as opposed to the actual. And, being allergic, seriously, causes anyway, to humidity, i think i’m qualified to comment. I don’t even drink water if I can help it.
Which does make me a paranoid drunk. or functional alcoholic.
To Lifted Spirits!
the video was about some media comparing last year to the dust bowl days.
Indeed, MeteoFrance (the leading French weather station) posts both what I assume are some reflection of actual temps and also what they call the “ressenti” or “felt temps” which overall makes the higher temps at least a degree higher…
which ones go down for the record and the climate models?
hmmmmmm…?
Interesting to know David Ray Griffin’s take (the father of the 9/11 truth movement) on this topic.
His 2015 book ‘Unprecedented: Can Civilization Survive the CO2 Crisis?’
gives dire warnings about global warming; all gloom and doom.
Maybe someone should guide him to this site?
funny how that goes… leading opinion-makers (for the “Truth Movement”), who like Chomsky or Monbiot, have “proven” their credibility,
suddenly toeing the establishement line…
oh dear… Griffin certainly seems sincere which is more than can be said of the sneering, arrogant, insulting linguist and journalist….
sorry, what I meant in my haste was that Chomsky and Monbiot had proven their credibility to potential “Truthers” Prior to 9/11 and then toed the establishment line…
anyway…don’t know about the CO2 crisis but my degree of lateness today certainly IS unprecedented…
There are already 8 major errors in the mainstream model of the sun.
It breaks with basic physics!
So, the model of our heat-source is completely wrong!
And on this wrong model other scientists have based their
climate models.
See also: http://www.reddit.com/r/plasmacosmology/wiki/
(Section SUN)
Let me pick a few:
1. False: The outside of the sun is much hotter than the inside.
2. False: There are no chemical reactions on the sun (besides nuclear).
3. False: magnetic field lines bump into each other causing energy bursts.
4. False: there are no significant electric fields on the sun.
5. False: pressure just around the sun is extremely low.
All of these can be proven to be false.
So let’s put the “established science” back
in the hole where it came from.
Due to these major errors, we get bullshit science
that other “scientists” use to produce even more bullshit.
Then after being chewed on by predators
this becomes politics.
Jimmy Dore – October 22, 2018
Oh man…this guy yells “Fire!” in the theatre…it is unfortunate.
Climate Change Way Worse Than We Thought
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLFX-OcbTLI
This whole thing reminds me of the Dental Mafia who continue to push soundbites promoting mercury and Fluoride, while suppressing their own studies which show the harm.
Once the mantra gets going, it is like a freight train coasting down the mountain.
Jimmy is sadly just parroting most stuff he catches around, after some sane filtering of course. He does have an important role in the alternative media, but I haven’t seen anything “original” out of him, yet.
I have tried to reach out his viewer base several times now, especially regarding climate chance, still completely fruitless. This time around I got in really early because he usually uploads during my off hours but this one was rather early in the morning.
http://prntscr.com/l9fwtx