The Global Warming Pause Explained
Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
Fact: the RSS global mean temperature anomaly dataset shows a least-squares linear regression trend of 0.0C from February 1997 to October 2015. But what does this really mean? And what is the significance of this global warming pause? Join me in today’s Thought For The Day as we explore this question.
SHOW NOTES:
Global Warming Hiatus, On Pause? #QFC @CorbettReport
IPCC AR5 Technical Summary (see Box TS.3 for pause discussion)
RSS Global Mean Temperature trend analysis Feb 1997 – Oct 2015
What Is The Average Global Temperature?
Global temperature datasets – overview
RSS upper air temperature data
NOAA State of the climate 2008 (See page S22 for pause discussion)
Pielke Jr. praises NOAA for making 15 year falsifiability claim
Climate change is unfalsifiable woo-woo pseudoscience
Phil Jones makes 15 years “before we get worried” claim
Contributions of Stratospheric Water Vapor to Decadal Changes in the Rate of Global Warming
Global warming lull down to China’s coal growth
Climate impacts of changing aerosol emissions since 1996
Oceans moderate climate change
Trenberth debunks himself: The oceans didn’t eat the global warming ‘missing heat’
Research Suggests Pacific Trade Winds Cause Pause
Slowdown in Tropical Pacific Flow Pinned on Climate Change
Slowdown due to Montreal Protocol!
66 excuses for the pause in global warming
The Recent Slowing in the Rise of Global Temperatures
Climate Oscillations and the Global Warming Faux Pause
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus
Congressman now threatens to subpoena commerce secretary over global warming report
US CLIVAR Summer 2015 edition of Variations
Has NOAA ‘busted’ the pause in global warming?
Curry on the Cowtan & Way ‘pausebuster’: ‘Is there anything useful [in it]?â€
The Pause lengthens again – just in time for Paris
Filed in: Videos
Subscribe
If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to receive more just like it.
Hi James,
you may have already talked of this.
http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/bernprop.html
It seems like a classic use of the propaganda techniques of Edward Bernays by the so called Climate “authorities”……Controlling what people think.
https://youtu.be/p8ERfxWouXs particularly around the 10 minute mark
Well, just came over to try to find a place to put this video I just found with Anthony Watts eloquently explaining the issue of Gatekeeping and Climate Fraud (also explaining the disappearence of the pause) just to discover that M Corbett had struck again with another scathing and ever-so-helpful video on the same topic!
So though M Corbett already offers a plethora of material I’ll just deposit my link as a little side dish. (apologies if it’s already been posted…)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjlPvwRP-fM
p.s. Bottom line: the upcoming Corbett Report holiday hiatus has to continue for a total of 15 days “before we get worried…”
uuuhhhhhhh…. hyucka hyucka…
And a Happy hiatus to you all!!
Dear James:
I feel that you have made a pretty good case for skepticism regarding the human impact on global warming. As with the skepticism (absolute certainty), regarding the fallicy of the “official” 911 story, it would be great to hear more about the motivation behind the global warming agenda. I have a feeling that this topic would make for a complete podocumentary similar to the one you created regarding the federal reserve. It might shift the focus from the argument for or against global warming to the more nefarious reseans why there has been such a strong push to promulgate this “official” story.
Hi James,
It’s interesting to note that the CEO of Apple was interviewed on the U.S. Television show “60 Minutes” last night and he said that one of the factors that justified Apple’s decision to export a good deal of their engineering to China and various other Asian Countries was the lack of qualified scientific minds being produced by colleges in the U.S. The ongoing incompetence of the Climate Science Sector probably contributed a great deal to this decision !
Of course the other factor which seems to have escaped the IPCC modelling is the decade/s of spraying nano particles into the atmosphere and the attendant actions of the top secret H.A.A.R.P. array in Alaska.
Apparently Evergreen Air have ceased spraying but like at lot of what the military does, it makes it difficult to know the parameters/inputs, but if that info is not factored into the IPCC models, then those IPCC models are nothing more than GIGO.
James, is it possible that temperature needs to be look at over many decades where warming is still evident.
See this animated Gif from NASA showing the “warming pause†as a time picking artifact:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/
Also see this 5-min video and the XL spread sheet of the UAH data below the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx6WzVGaTWM
UAH is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UAH_satellite_temperature_dataset
Here see the temperature comparison in the graph at the top between ocean, ice, land, and atmosphere:
https://skepticalscience.com/ipcc-global-warming-pause.htm
“The speed bump only applies to surface temperatures, which only represent about 2 percent of the overall warming of the global climate…over 90 percent of global warming goes into heating the oceans…â€
Maybe the IPCC is a puppet organization but tundra & glacier melting seem to be quite real. Happy if you can debunk NASA & IPCC with multi decadal data.
The “warming pause†as a time picking artifact is best seen here, 2nd graph down on the right:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_hiatus
Source: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/
Click the Global Annual Mean Surface Air Temp Change link