Interview 1478 – 9/11 Whistleblowers on Coast to Coast AM
Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
James Corbett joins Coast to Coast AM guest host Richard Syrett to discuss the latest 9/11 developments, from the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District’s historic resolution calling for a new investigation of 9/11 to the empaneling of a Grand Jury to investigate 9/11 to the Institute of Northern Engineering’s new study concluding that WTC 7 did not collapse due to fire. Corbett and Syrett also engage in a detailed breakdown of the recent Corbett Report documentary, 9/11 Whistleblowers.
Filed in: Interviews
Subscribe
If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to receive more just like it.
I am glad that Corbett got to talk about 9/11 on Coast to Coast. It reaches a wide, different audience. At one time, Coast to Coast avoided the 9/11 truth topic.
How many people do you think believed that building 7 came down as a result of fires?
Why would most people be interested in hearing something that they already knew from the get go?
Something that’s been the primary focus of the alternative controlled opposition media from the start.
Is it because the government’s truth movements have instructed the corrupt academia to produce a worthless study for the 9/11 anniversary?
Is it because the complicit firemen are now calling for the perps to investigate themselves again?
Maybe the whistleblower’s acting skills have gotten better since then.
You’re wasting your time. lol
If you’re an American, I believe you are overestimating the awareness of your countrymen. Even otherwise well-informed, intelligent, pro-natural rights folks have trouble accepting the fact that THEIR government could possibly have allowed, let alone perpetrated, mass murder, extortion, propagandization, drug smuggling, etc. Go ahead and ask around normie circles. We are very much outnumbered. If spreading information is futile, then there is truly no hope for us. No going back to liberty until the fire of a revolution clears the land of corruption.
People believe any old rubbish they’re fed, so long as the feeder is wearing a suit and taxing them. They’re quite content to politely quibble over articles concerning the finer details of their subjugation, but given half a chance, they’ll do sod all about it. So long as they can opine to their children that everything is under control and the nanny state will always be there for them, they’ll basically believe anything. Not only that, but they’ll defend it vociferously, blindly hoping that the law of averages will weigh in their favour, and everything will stay the same. When things turn out differently, they deal with it in a dignified, rational manner, telling themselves and everyone around them, that this could never have reasonably been predicted. Human adults are really just old children, who need to be reassured constantly. They’re easily assured. Rant over.
Great show!
(1) re: theory presented by a caller that the plane that supposedly crashed in Shanksforth PA was supposed to hit Bldg 7 in the morning. I agree that this is a valid theory. I first read about it on a blog (AmericanEveryman) that has been purged from the internet. But where does this theory get us? On a practical level, probably nowhere. But very interesting nonetheless.
(2) re: the Bob Kerry quote regarding the idea that 9/11 was part of a 30-year conspiracy. James stated that no one has ever followed up on Kerry’s statement that 9/11 was part of a 30-year conspiracy. Well, doesn’t this tie in to Christopher Bollyn’s work? See http://www.bollyn.com . James, why don’t you follow up on this with Bob Kerry? Or I can do it, if you give me some credentials. If you want to vet me, I can give you some URL’s to start with. And a reference, if you don’t remember me.
–Dennis